Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 28, 2020
Accepted
March 23, 2021
Published
June 2, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1759 Download : 3554

Main Article Content

Abstract

Sharia economic dispute resolution through mediation has many advantages, but the percentage of success in the process of sharia economic dispute resolution through mediation at the Yogyakarta Regional Religious Court is still low. Furthermore, it was speculated that a pandemic condition gives influence to the mediation implementation optimally. The research was to examine the factors to the low success rate of sharia economic dispute resolution through mediation at the Yogyakarta Regional Religious Court. This research an empirical juridical study using primary data and secondary data with a statutory approach method. Data were analyzed escriptive-qualitative analysis. The results show that the settlement of sharia economic disputes through mediation at the Yogyakarta Regional Religious Court is still low due to several factors, among others, there are not many judge mediators who have mediator certificates and sharia economic certificates, the parties are not in good faith, there is no regulation regarding the presence of the parties through remote audio-visual intermediaries on the Covid-19 pandemic and the constraints of the fast handling process in the mediation process as already regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 (PERMA No.1 Of 2016).

Keywords

Mediation PERMA No. 1 of 2016 Religious Courts

Article Details

How to Cite
Yunita, A. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Mediasi Pada Masa Pandemi di Pengadilan Agama Wilayah Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 28(2), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Aripin, Jaenal, Peradilan Agama dalam Bingkai Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia, Prenadia Media Group, Jakarta, 2008.
  3. Margono, Suyud, “ADR&Arbitrase (Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum)”, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor Selatan, 2004.
  4. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2005.
  5. Soekanto, Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Penerbit UI, Jakarta, 2006.
  6. Jurnal
  7. Aida Maita, “Arbitration of Islamic Financial Disputes”, Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 20, issue 1, 2014.
  8. Dewi Nurul Musjtari, et all., “Reformulation Of mediation in Dispute Settlement on Islamic Banking”, Humanities & Social Science Reviews, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2019.
  9. Darma Dian Saputra, dkk., “Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan (Studi Pada Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang)”, Pactum Law Journal, Vol 3. No. 3. 2019.
  10. Erie Haryanto, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Iqtishadia, Vol. 1 No. 1, Juni, 2014.
  11. Husam Suleiman, “Crowdfunding and the Opportunity Presented in the American Islamic Financial Sphere”, Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, October-December, 2016.
  12. Khoirun Nisa, “Putusan Mk No. 93/Puu-X/2012 Menuju Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syari’ah”, Jurnal Iqtishad, Vol. 4 (2), 2017.
  13. Michael JT Mc Millen, “Islamic Shariah Compliant Project Finance: Collateral Security and Financing Structure Case Studies”, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 24, 2000.
  14. Muhammad Arifin dan Bismar Nasution, “Dynamcic Studies Of Regulation Of Syariah Banking Indonesia”, International Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 3, 2015.
  15. Muhammad Saifullah, “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Jawa Tengah”, Al Ahkam, Vol. 25, 2015.
  16. Muhammad Syafii Antonio, “Islamic Microfinance Initiatives To Enhance Small and Medium Interprises In Indonesia From Historical Overview to Contemporary Situation”, Journal Of Indonesian Islam, Vol. 5 No. 2, December, 2011.
  17. Nita Triana, “Urgensitas Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Purbalingga”, Law Reform, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019.
  18. Nur Fauzi, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Berbasih Sulh (Perdamaian) Untuk Mencapai Keadilan”, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. I, Nomor 2, Oktober, 2018.
  19. Sitti Shaleha Madjid, “Penanganan Pembiayaan Bermasalah Pada Bank Syariah”, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2018.
  20. Shaykh Yusuf Talal De Lorenzo, “Shari’ah Compliance Risk”, Chicago Joirnal of International Law, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2007.
  21. Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti, “Pengelolaan Risiko Pembiayaan Di Bank Syariah”, ADIL: Jurnal Huku, Vol. 3 No. 2.
  22. Yulkarnain Harahab, “Kesiapan Pengadilan Agama dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 20 No. 1, Februari, 2018.
  23. Internet
  24. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/hingga-juli-2020-aset-keuangan-syariah-tembus-rp-163908 triliun diposting tanggal 21 September 2020.
  25. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  26. Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 159.
  27. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 5076.
  28. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 94.
  29. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Berita Negara RI Nomor 2059.
  30. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan, Berita Negara RI Nomor 175.
  31. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2016 tentang Sertifikasi Hakim Ekonomi Syariah, Berita Negara RI Nomor 597.
  32. Putusan Pengadilan
  33. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang atas Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.