Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 843 Download : 1025

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

One form of company participation in sustainable development is the preparation of quality reports (SR) taking into account SR content and pressure from stakeholders including the determinants of SR quality in companies listed on the IDX during 2017-2020 with an isomorphism theory approach. The sample for this study was 444 companies using the purposive method, with the criteria for companies compiling SRs during the year of observation either separately or in combination with the annual financial statements. Data analysis with multivariate regression. The results showed that environmental pressure and social pressure coercively isomorphism had an effect on SR quality, and industrial pressure had mimetic isomorphism affected SR quality, while normative pressure from the audit committee had no effect on SR quality because p > 0.05. This study proves that testing the quality of SR with a coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism theory approach can determine the quality of SR.

Keywords

Sustainability Report quality isomorphism stakeholder pressure

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Adaui, C. R. L. (2020). Sustainability reporting quality of peruvian listed companies and the impact of regulatory requirements of sustainability disclosures. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031135
  2. Adhariani, D., & du Toit, E. (2020). Readability of sustainability reports: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-10-2019-0194
  3. Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing...: UMUC Library OneSearch: Business & Management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 141–156. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=25&sid=91788b78-3487-4720-9cb5-8bc294ad7618%40sessionmgr4004&hid=4203
  4. Badia, F., Bracci, E., & Tallaki, M. (2020). Quality and diffusion of social and sustainability reporting in Italian public utility companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114525
  5. Baldini, M., Maso, L. D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). Role of country- and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1
  6. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265
  7. Bappenas. (2019). Roadmap of SDGs Indonesia : A Hihglight. 27–36. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/sites/unicef.org.indonesia/files/2019-07/ROADMAP OF SDGs INDONESIA_final draft.pdf
  8. Buallay, A., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2020). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 249-264.
  9. Busch, T., & Friede, G. (2018). The robustness of the corporate social and financial performance relation: A second-order meta-analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1480
  10. Chen, X., Li, X., & Huang, X. (2022). The impact of corporate characteristics and external pressure on environmental information disclosure: a model using environmental management as a mediator. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 12797–12809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11410-x
  11. Correa-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Garcia-Meca, E. (2020). Corporate governance and its implications for sustainability reporting quality in Latin American business groups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121142
  12. Costa, E. (2014). Voluntary Disclosure in a Regulated Context: The Case of Italian Social Enterpris. Accountability and Social Accounting for Social and Non- Profit Organizations.
  13. Del Giudice, A., & Rigamonti, S. (2020). Does audit improve the quality of ESG scores? Evidence from corporate misconduct. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145670
  14. Dias, C. A., & Basuki, B. (2018). Study of The Determinants Existence of External Assurance on Sustainability Reports in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session for Indonesian Study (JCAE 2018) - Contemporary Accounting Studies in Indonesia, 16-22.
  15. Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2004). The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20041
  16. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Advances in Strategic Management, 17(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1
  17. Dissanayake, D., Kuruppu, S., Qian, W., & Tilt, C. (2020). Barriers for sustainability reporting: evidence from Indo-Pacific region. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(2), 264–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2020-0703
  18. Evana, E. (2017). The Effect Of Sustainability Reporting Disclosure Based On Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 On Company Performance (A Study On Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange). The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 20(3), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.394
  19. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5
  20. Gamerschlag, R., M€oller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2), 233–262. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3
  21. Hamdani, R., Najamuddin, Y., Haryanto, P. D., & Kholid, M. N. (2020). A comparative study on CSR disclosure between Indonesian Islamic banks and conventional banks: the application of GRI and ISR indexes. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 24(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol24.iss2.art8
  22. Hasan, S., Kassim, A. A. M., & Hamid, M. A. A. (2020). The impact of audit quality, audit committee and financial reporting quality: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 10(5), 272.
  23. Khan, H., Bose, S., Mollik, A. T., & Harun, H. (2020). “Green washing” or “authentic effort”? An empirical investigation of the quality of sustainability reporting by banks. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3330
  24. Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2017). Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: Evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 27-39.
  25. Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254
  26. Lenz, R., Sarens, G., & Jeppesen, K. K. (2018). in Search of a Measure of Effectiveness for Internal Audit Functions: an Institutional Perspective. Edpacs, 58(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2018.1511324
  27. Lulu, C. L. (2020). Stakeholder Pressure and the Quality Of Sustainability Report: Evidence From Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, Kewirausahaan, Dan Teknologi Finansial, 2(1).
  28. Manning, B., Braam, G., & Reimsbach, D. (2019). Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—Effects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1687
  29. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691229270-004
  30. Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Romi, A. M. (2019). Creating Legitimacy for Sustainability Assurance Practices: Evidence from Sustainability Restatements. In European Accounting Review (Vol. 28). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1469424
  31. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
  32. Nasution, R. M., & Adhariani, D. (2016). Simbolis Atau Substantif? Analisis Praktik Pelaporan Csr Dan Kualitas Pengungkapan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2016.02
  33. OJK RI. (2017). Peraturan OJK Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 Tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan Bagi Lembaga Jasa keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik.
  34. Qisthi, F., & Fitri, M. (2020). Pengungkapan Laporan Keberlanjutan Berdasarkan Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 5(4), 469–484.
  35. Rehman, Z. U., Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Asif, M., Alharthi, M., Irfan, M., & Glowacz, A. (2020). Do corporate social responsibility disclosures improve financial performance? A perspective of the Islamic banking industry in Pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083302
  36. RI. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208008946937
  37. RI. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas.
  38. Rudyanto, A., & Siregar, S. V. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2017-0071
  39. Sjåfjell, B. (2016). Achieving corporate sustainability: What is the role of the shareholder? Hanne Birkmose, Shareholders’ Duties in Europe (Kluwer Law International, 2017)., 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813109193_0020
  40. Tang, Y., Sun, M., Ma, W., & Bai, S. (2020). The External Pressure, Internal Drive and Voluntary Carbon Disclosure in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(14), 3367–3382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1689356
  41. Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813
  42. Vadasi, C., Bekiaris, M., & Andrikopoulos, A. (2020). Corporate governance and internal audit: an institutional theory perspective. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2019-0215
  43. Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Cosma, S., Leopizzi, R., & Pizzi, S. (2017). Directive 2014/95/EU: Are Italian companies already compliant? Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081385
  44. Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Leopizzi, R., & Pizzi, S. (2019). The state of art of corporate social disclosure before the introduction of non-financial reporting directive: a cross country analysis. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(4), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2017-0275
  45. Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Khan, M., Ali, W., & Shad, F. (2020). Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: A step-by-step procedure for non-experts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3086–3103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2559