Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 277 Download : 214

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – The study aims to determine whether Islamic banks' debt financing and equity financing are procyclical or counter-cyclical.
Methodology – The data used in this study cover eight Islamic commercial banks and span from 2008 to 2020, thereby including 72 observations. The analysis employs the dynamic panel data model estimated using the GMM method (Generalized Method of Moments).
Findings –The debt-based financing, under murabahah, salam, istishna, and ijarah contracts, did not display clear procyclical or counter-cyclical behavior. In contrast, equity financing based on mudharabah and musyarakah contracts demonstrated procyclical characteristics concerning economic fluctuation.
Implications – Policymakers need to pay more attention to Islamic banks with a greater proportion of equity financing for both micro and macroprudential policy purposes since procyclicality is likely to be associated with higher risks. Similarly, Islamic banks with greater proportion of equity financing need to watch carefully the behavior of their equity financing concerning its effect on risks for the purpose of their risk management and prudential policy.
Originality – This research paper fills in the absence of studies that examine which category of Islamic bank financing – debt-based or equity-based financing - is more procyclical.

Keywords

Debt Financing Equity Financing Islamic Bank

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pratami, A., Afandi, A., Sriyana, J., & Feriyanto, N. (2023). Are sharia bank financings in Indonesia procyclical?. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 9(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol9.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Addury, M. M. (2017). Bank syariah dalam perspektif nasabah muslim. Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/wahanaislamika.v3i1.48
  2. Addury, M. M. (2019). Efisiensi dan kinerja perbankan syariah di indonesia. Ecoplan : journal of economics and development studies, 2(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecoplan.v2i2.23
  3. Akinsola, F. A., & Ikhide, S. (2018). Is commercial bank lending in South Africa procyclical? Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 26(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-09-2016-0073
  4. Albertazzi, U., & Bottero, M. (2014). Foreign bank lending: Evidence from the global financial crisis. Journal of International Economics, 92, S22–S35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.01.002
  5. Antonio, M. S. (2001). Bank Syariah Dari Teorin ke Praktik. Gema Insani Press.
  6. Ascarya, Rahmawati, S., & Karim, A. A. (2016). Testing of the procyclicality of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia. In M. Zulkhibri, A. G. Ismail, & S. E. Hidayat (Eds.), Macroprudential Regulation and Policy for the Islamic Financial Industry: Theory and Applications (pp. 133–152). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30445-8_8
  7. Aysan, A. F., & Ozturk, H. (2018). Does Islamic banking offer a natural hedge for business cycles? Evidence from a dual banking system. Journal of Financial Stability, 36, 22–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2018.02.005
  8. Bank Indonesia. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Bank Indonesia 2021. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/Pages/LTBI-2021.aspx
  9. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016
  10. Bertay, A. C., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2015). Bank ownership and credit over the business cycle: Is lending by state banks less procyclical? Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, 326–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.012
  11. Bofondi, M., Carpinelli, L., & Sette, E. (2018). Credit supply during a sovereign debt crisis. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(3), 696–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx020
  12. Carvalho, D. (2014). The real effects of government-owned banks: Evidence from an emerging market. The Journal of Finance, 69(2), 577–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12130
  13. Cole, S. (2009). Financial development, bank ownership, and growth: Or, does quantity imply quality? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.33
  14. Cull, R., & Martínez Pería, M. S. (2013). Bank ownership and lending patterns during the 2008–2009 financial crisis: Evidence from Latin America and Eastern Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12), 4861–4878. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.08.017
  15. De Haas, r., & Van Lelyveld, I. (2014). Multinational banks and the global financial crisis: Weathering the perfect storm? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(s1), 333–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12094
  16. Farooq, M., & Zaheer, S. (2015). Are Islamic banks more resilient during financial panics? Pacific Economic Review, 20(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12096
  17. Godlewski, C., Skala, D., & Weill, L. (2018). Is lending by Polish cooperative banks procyclical? A multidimensional analysis of credit supply cyclicality in Polish cooperative banks–the country and regional perspective. Narodowy Bank Polski, Economic Research Department.
  18. Hasan, M., & Dridi, J. (2011). The effects of the global crisis on Islamic and conventional banks: A comparative study. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 02(02), 163–200. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793993311000270
  19. Ibrahim, M. H. (2016). Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system. Economic Modelling, 55, 127–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.01.013
  20. Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Unchecked intermediaries: Price manipulation in an emerging stock market. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(1), 203–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.014
  21. Lubis, H., Pratama, K., Pratama, I., & Pratami, A. (2019). A systematic review of corporate social responsibility disclosure. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(9).
  22. Mansour, W., Ben Jedidia, K., & Majdoub, J. (2015). How ethical is Islamic banking in the light of the objectives of Islamic law? Journal of Religious Ethics, 43(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12086
  23. Micco, A., & Panizza, U. (2006). Bank ownership and lending behavior. Economics Letters, 93(2), 248–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.05.009
  24. Pratami, A., Tohirin, A., & Pratama, K. (2021). Bank lending decision and business cycles: Are Indonesian Islamic banks different? International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 13(1), 215–234.
  25. Rizvi, S. A. R., Narayan, P. K., Sakti, A., & Syarifuddin, F. (2020). Role of Islamic banks in Indonesian banking industry: An empirical exploration. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62, 101117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.02.002
  26. Sapienza, P. (2004). The effects of government ownership on bank lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 357–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2002.10.002
  27. Soedarmono, W., Pramono, S. E., & Tarazi, A. (2017). The procyclicality of loan loss provisions in Islamic banks. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 911–919. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.05.003
  28. Venardos, A. M. (2006). Islamic banking and finance in South-East Asia. In Asia-Pacific Business Series (Vol. 3). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/6179
  29. Verbeek, M. (2004). A guide to modern econometrics (2nd Edition). Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.
  30. Weill, L., & Zins, A. (2021). Is Islamic banking more procyclical? Cross-country evidence. Comparative Economic Studies, 63(2), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-020-00143-y