Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 7, 2023
Accepted
November 25, 2023
Published
November 30, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 67 Download : 57

Main Article Content

Abstract

Optimistic bias adalah fenomena kognitif di mana seseorang cenderung meremehkan risiko negatif dan meremehkan peluang positif dalam konteks situasi atau keputusan. Sebuah studi menunjukan bahwa peningkatan beban kerja mental dikaitkan dengan penurunan tingkat akurasi dalam mendeteksi informasi dan waktu reaksi yang lebih lama. Seorang pilot melakukan manuver lebih baik ketika respon stres nya lebih rendah. Berdasarkan latar belakang masalah tersebut perlu untuk dilakukan penelitian untuk mengetahui apakah pengguna flight simulator mengalami optimistic bias. Secara statistik dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat kesalahan sistematis / bias pada data akurasi estimasi score penyelesaian tugas menggunakan flight simulator. Responden pengguna flight simulator terlalu optimis dalam mengestimasi nilai / skor penyelesaian tugas. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah optimistic bias terjadi pada akurasi estimasi nilai / skor penyelesaian tugas menggunakan flight simulator. Berdasarkan hasil wawancara bahwa responden menginginkan nilai atau skor yang lebih baik pada penyelesaian tugas berikutnya. Hal inilah yang menjadi salah satu penyebab terjadinya optimistic bias.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Bagus Wahyu Utomo, Institut Teknologi Dirgantara Adisutjipto

Industrial Engineering

Esa Rengganis Suliartha, Institut Teknologi Dirgantara Adisutjipto

Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknologi Industri

Prasidananto Nur Santoso, Institut Teknologi Dirgantara Adisutjipto

Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknologi Industri

References

  1. Bertelson, P., Imbert, M., Kempson, R., Osherson, D., Schnelle, H., Streitz, N., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., & Viviani, P. (1987). Cognitive Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85276-3_5

  2. Cao, X., Macnaughton, P., Cadet, L. R., Cedeno-Laurent, J. G., Flanigan, S., Vallarino, J., Donnelly-McLay, D., Christiani, D. C., Spengler, J. D., & Allen, J. G. (2019). Heart rate variability and performance of commercial airline pilots during flight simulations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020237

  3. Cross, J., Boag-Hodgson, C., Ryley, T., Mavin, T. J., & Potter, L. E. (2023). Using Extended Reality in Flight Simulators: A Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(9), 3961–3975. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3173921

  4. Dehnad, K. (1987). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Technometrics, 29(4), 495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1987.10488295

  5. Demerouti, E., Veldhuis, W., Coombes, C., & Hunter, R. (2019). Burnout among pilots: psychosocial factors related to happiness and performance at simulator training. Ergonomics, 62(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1464667

  6. Hollnagel, Erik (2003). Handbook of Cognitive Task Design. In Handbook of Cognitive Task Design (1st ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410607775

  7. Lebreton, M., Abitbol, R., Daunizeau, J., & Pessiglione, M. (2015). Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal. Nature Neuroscience, 18(8), 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4064

  8. Lee, J. D., & Krlik, A. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199757183.001.0001

  9. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. A. (2005). CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.354387

  10. ND, W. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(39), 806–820.

  11. Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2021). Motivating Students to Learn STEM via Engaging Flight Simulation Activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 608–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09907-2

  12. Obaid, M. S., & Mebayet, S. O. (2021). Drone controlled real live flight simulator. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1818(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1818/1/012104

  13. Puri, M., & Robinson, D. T. (2011). Optimism and Economic Choice. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.686240

  14. Sharot, T., & Garrett, N. (2016). Forming Beliefs: Why Valence Matters. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.002

  15. Sharot, T., Guitart-Masip, M., Korn, C. W., Chowdhury, R., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). How dopamine enhances an optimism bias in humans. Current Biology, 22(16), 1477–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.053

  16. Sharot, T., Korn, C. W., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality. Nature Neuroscience, 14(11), 1475–1479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2949

  17. Sharot, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (2020). How people decide what they want to know. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0793-1

  18. Stanton, N. A., Li, W. C., & Harris, D. (2017). Ergonomics and Human Factors in Aviation. In Ergonomics (Vol. 60, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1262578

  19. Wanyan, X., Zhuang, D., Lin, Y., Xiao, X., & Song, J. W. (2018). Influence of mental workload on detecting information varieties revealed by mismatch negativity during flight simulation. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 64, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2017.08.004

  20. Zimmermann, U. (2019). The Influential Mind: What the Brain Reveals About Our Power to Change Others. Public Integrity, 21(1), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1511668